![]() ![]() You do lose around 5% of the graphics cores, but retain the full 8GB of VRAM and memory bandwidth of that card. It performs within a few percent or so of the 2070, so this is almost like Nvidia lopping $100 off the 2070's MSRP. Inserted right between the $350 GeForce RTX 2060 and $5 Super, we can’t imagine that anyone actually asked for a $400 GeForce RTX 2060 Super.A better way to look at it is that the 2060 Super is offering near-2070 performance for $100 less. So, cool on Nvidia for flexing their muscles and remaining the strongest, I just don't see it winning over that many new customers. ![]() I have a feeling that most of the early adopters banking on the promise of future support probably bought an RTX card months ago. I don't know about anyone else, but I'm not exactly lining up to spend $400+ for somewhat prettier graphics in the 2-3 games I find interesting. The overall number of upcoming RTX games is still lower than the overall number of RTX -laptops- on the market. I'm not sure if we'll ever see an RTX card for under $350, but AMD could probably drop the 5700 down well below that if they were really pressed.Īs for the value proposition of Ray Tracing itself. Unfortunately, all those leftover RT and AI cores make for a giant and expensive to manufacture die. I think if Nvidia could have dropped the price of the RTX 2060, they probably would have done that instead of releasing the RTX 2060 super for $50 more. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |